Art turns into philosophy
Art, considered in its highest vocation, is and remains for us a thing
of the past.
G.W.F. Hegel: Introduction
to Aesthetics: The Introduction to the Berlin Aesthetics Lectures
of the 1820s. Translation: T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1979, p. 11.
At this highest stage, art now transcends itself,
in that it forsakes the element of reconciled embodiment of the spirit
in sensuous form and passes over from the poetry of imagination to the
prose of thought.
G.W.F. Hegel: Introduction
to Aesthetics: The Introduction to the Berlin Aesthetics Lectures
of the 1820s. Translation: T.M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1979, p. 89.
The major question that now arises is this: If
true romantic art is no longer satisfactory, then what is to replace
it?
Jack Kaminsky: Hegel on Art. An interpretation
of Hegel's Aesthetics. Albany: State University of New York Press,
1962, p. 101.
Aus der Kunst eine philosophische Frage machen
. . ., heißt das nicht die Herrschaftsgeste der Philosophie
wiederholen, die immer schon die Kunst dem Logos und der Wahrheit
unterordnen wollte und die bezeichnenderweise immer schon an die Spitze
der Hierarchie die Sprachkünste, die Poesie gestellt hat?
Sarah Kofman: Melancholie der Kunst, Graz & Wien, 1986. [@ Sigrid Schade: "Die Kunst des Kommentars."
Kunstforum International Vol. 100 (April/May 1989).]
More
about Philosophy as Art as Philosophy